CROSS-BORDER PUBLIC PROCUREMENT : A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW ON REGIONAL INTEGRATION, GOVERNANCE AND DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION
Abstract
This study examines the development of research on cross-border public procurement or border procurement through a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) combined with bibliometric analysis. The study aims to identify publication trends, dominant research themes, key variables, and future research opportunities related to border procurement. Data were collected from the Scopus database using the PRISMA framework, resulting in 39 selected articles published up to May 2026. Bibliometric analysis was conducted using VOSviewer software to map publication trends, country distribution, institutional contributions, author productivity, and keyword co-occurrence networks. The findings reveal that research on border procurement remains relatively limited and is predominantly concentrated in developed countries, particularly within the European context. The literature mainly focuses on themes such as regulation and governance, digital procurement and transparency, regional market integration, sustainability, healthcare procurement, and barriers to cross-border procurement implementation. Several dominant variables identified in the literature include digital procurement, transparency, regulation, market integration, administrative barriers, sustainability, and competitive procedures. The study also highlights significant research gaps related to border procurement in developing countries and border regions outside Europe, particularly in ASEAN contexts. The integration of SLR and bibliometric analysis contributes to a more comprehensive understanding of the intellectual structure and thematic evolution of border procurement research. Practically, the findings provide insights for policymakers and practitioners in improving procurement governance, regulatory harmonization, digital transformation, and cross-border cooperation. The study recommends future research to explore procurement governance, digital readiness, and institutional challenges in developing-country border regions.
References
International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 22(3), 365–383. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218194012400086
Bandiera, O., Bosio, E., Spagnolo, G., & Centre for Economic Policy Research (Eds.). (2021). Procurement in focus rules, discretion, and emergencies. CEPR Press.
Begzhan, A., Alibekov, S., Kussainova, A., Zhailau, Z., & Baitukayeva, D. (2026). LEGAL REGULATION OF PUBLIC PROCUREMENT IN EU: CHALLENGES AND PROSPECTS. InterEULawEast, 12(2). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.22598/iele.2025.12.2.1
Borges, L. A., Silva, P. H. B. D., Zara, A. L. D. S. A., & Oliveira, E. S. F. D. (2025). Health surveillance in tackling COVID-19 in Brazil: A scope review. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, 30(5), e02202025. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232025305.02202025en
Bulut, C., & Yen, B. P.-C. (2013). E-procurement in public sector: A global overview. Electronic Government, 10(2), 189–210. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1504/EG.2013.052601
Cecil, P. (2024). Cross-Border Supply Chain Optimization: Strategies for Managing International Operations While Maintaining Speed and Cost Efficiency. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management (IJSRM), 12(05), 6565–6588. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v12i05.em23
Cox, A., & Furlong, P. (1997). Cross-border trade and contract awards: The intellectual myopia at the heart of the EU procurement rules. European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 3(1), 9–20. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-7012(96)00008-1
Deltas, G., & Evenett, S. J. (2025). Language as a trade barrier in public procurement: Evidence from Georgia’s policies on English language documentation. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 99. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2024.101898
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Essigmann, H. T., Aguilar, D. A., Perkison, W. B., Bay, K. G., Deaton, M. R., Brown, S. A., Hanis, C. L., & Brown, E. L. (2022). Epidemiology of Antibiotic Use and Drivers of Cross-Border Procurement in a Mexican American Border Community. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 832266. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.832266
Fayos, T., Calderón, H., García-García, J. M., & Derqui, B. (2022). The upcoming rise of SMEs in cross-border public procurement: Is it a matter of networking capabilities? Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 20(4), 537–563. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-022-00310-5
Gelderman, K., Ghijsen, P., & Schoonen, J. (2010). Explaining non-compliance with European Union Procurement Directives: A multidisciplinary perspective. Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(2), 243–264. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2009.02051.x
Ghossein, T., Hoekman, B., & Shingal, A. (2021). Public Procurement, Regional Integration, and the Belt and Road Initiative. World Bank Research Observer, 36(2), 131–163. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkab004
Hanspach, P. (2023). The home bias in procurement. Cross-border procurement of medical supplies during the Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 89. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2023.102976
Kurochkin, D. A. (2019). Issues of legal regulation of the sector of research services in the Eurasian Economic Union*. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. Pravo, 10(2), 332–352. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2019.209
Kutlina-Dimitrova, Z., & Lakatos, C. (2016). Determinants of direct cross-border public procurement in EU Member States. Review of World Economics, 152(3), 501–528. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10290-016-0251-3
Lombardi, R., & Rossa, S. (2024). Theoretical Models and Implementation Practices: Critical Legal Analysis of Joint Cross- Border Procurement.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The Prisma Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Mutangili, S. K. (2025). Cross-Border Procurement Challenges: Harmonizing International Supply Chain Regulations. Journal of Procurement & Supply Chain, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t2458
Nikou, V. (2025). Spatial interdependence and cross-border spillover effects in the ecological footprint of consumption: The role of inclusive policies and public procurement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 494. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144992
Schoenmaekers, S. (2021). Public Procurement, Culture and Mozzarella: ‘Que Dici?’ European Procurement and Public Private Partnership Law Review, 16(3), 205–219. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.21552/epppl/2021/3/6
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Soe, R.-M. (2020). Innovation procurement as key to cross-border ITS pilots. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 12(4), 387–403. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEG.2020.112585
Zulkarnaen, W., Fitriani, I., & Yuningsih, N. (2020). Pengembangan Supply Chain Management Dalam Pengelolaan Distribusi Logistik Pemilu Yang Lebih Tepat Jenis, Tepat Jumlah Dan Tepat Waktu Berbasis Human Resources Competency Development Di KPU Jawa Barat. Jurnal Ilmiah MEA (Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi), 4(2), 222-243. https://doi.org/10.31955/mea.vol4.iss2.pp222-243.
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi (MEA)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

