LIQUIDITY LEVEL ANALYSIS OF FOOD AND BEVERAGE COMPANIES
Abstract
This study aims to determine the Financial Performance of the Liquidity Level of Food and Beverage Companies as measured by the Current Ratio, Quick Ratio, and Cash Ratio. The results showed the liquidity level of seven companies used in the study. In the Current Ratio, six companies had a liquidity level above 100%, so the companies had the ability to meet their short-term obligations. While in the Quick Ratio, there are five companies that have a liquidity level above 100%, then the companies have the ability to meet short-term obligations outside of inventory and have no difficulty in fulfilling short-term obligations. In the Cash Ratio, the companies have a liquidity level below 100%, thus the company does not have the ability to pay short-term obligations from the available cash, and the companies have cash difficulties paying the short-term debt. Companies need to increase the level of liquidity from the ratio quickly, by managing the amount of inventory efficiently and handling the amount of inventory according to needs.
References
Fahmi, Irham. 2012. Introduction to the Capital Market. Bandung: Alphabeta.
Harahap, Sofyan Syafri, 2009. Critical Theory of Financial Statements. Jakarta: Earth Literacy
Mamduh M. Hanafi. 2005. Financial Management. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
https://new.detik.com/adv-nhl-detikcom/d-4439261/industri-food-jadi-one-one-sector increase-value-investment .
Kasmir. 2010. Introduction to Financial Management Second Edition. Jakarta: Kencana.
Munawir, S. 2010. Analysis of Financial Statements Fourth Edition. Fifteenth Printing. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Farah Margaretha. 2014. Fundamentals of Financial Management. Jakarta: Dian Rakyat.
M. Ihsan Malik. 2015. Liquidity Ratio Analysis at PT. Makassar Jasmine.
e -journal, stienobel.Indonesia.ac.id March 31.
Sartono, Agus. 2010. Financial Management Theory and Applications. Edition 4. Yogjakarta: BPFE.
PSAK No.1 (Revised 2009) concerning Presentation of Financial Statements of the Indonesian Institute of Accountants.
Sugiyono. (2014). Educational Research Methods Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Approaches. Bandung: Alphabeta.
Dedi Suhendro. 2017. Profitability and Liquidity Analysis to Assess Financial Performance at PT. Siantar Top. Tbk. Journal of Human Falah Vol. 4 No. 2 July-December 2017.
Selfin Sintia K, Jhony M, D L. Tampi. Analysis of Liquidity Levels at PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia Tbk. Journal of Business Administration 2016.
Manahan P. Tampubolon. 2013. Financial Management (Finance Management). Jakarta: Mitra Wacana Media
Zulkarnaen, W., Fitriani, I., & Yuningsih, N. (2020). Development of Supply Chain Management in the Management of Election Logistics Distribution that is More Appropriate in Type, Quantity and Timely Based on Human Resources Competency Development at KPU West Java. MEA Scientific Journal” (Management, Economics, & Accounting), 4(2), 222-243. https://doi.org/10.31955/mea.vol4.iss2.pp222-243.
https://tpsfood.id/our-company/about-kaBi
https://www.wilmarcahayaindonesia.com
https://www.idnfinancials.com/id/icbp/pt-indofood-cbp-hasil-makmur-tbk
https://www.idnfinancials.com/id/indf/pt-indofood-hasil-makmur-tbk#company-overview
https://mayoraindah.co.id/
https://www.sekarlaut.com/about.php?aID=4
www.idx.co.id
Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Ilmiah MEA (Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.