OPINI AUDIT GOING CONCERN : FAKTOR AUDITOR DAN FAKTOR NON AUDITOR

Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Subsektor Tekstil dan Garmen yang Tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia Tahun 2015-2019

  • Majidah Majidah Universitas Telkom, Bandung
  • Afie Firdayanti Universitas Telkom, Bandung

Abstract

The going concern audit opinion indicates the auditor doubts about the company business continuity which reflect in company’s financial statements. The study purpose to determine the effect of auditor factors (audit tenure and auditor’s industry specialization) and non-auditor factors (company size, funding decisions and institutional ownership) on going concern audit opinions on textile and garment sub-sector companies listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange during period 2015-2019. Through the sampling criteria, 80 research samples were obtained. Data analysis using logistic regression because dependent variable has a nominal scale. The funding decision variable is a novelty in this study.  However, what effects going concern audit opinion is only the auditor industry.

References

Afiyahsyifa, F., & Majidah. (2020). Pengaruh Reputasi KAP, Kualitas Audit, Profitabilitas, Leverage, dan Opini Audit Tahun Sebelumnya Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern. E-Proceeding of Management, 7(1), 963–971.
Ashari, P. N., & Suryani, E. (2019). Analisis Pengaruh Financial Distress, Disclosure, Kepemilikan Institusional Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern. E-Proceeding of Management, 6(2), 2947–2954.
Averio, T. (2020). The Analysis Of Influencing Factors On The Going Concern Audit Opinion – A Study In Manufacturing Firms In Indonesia. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-09-2020-0078
Diana, D., & Majidah. (2019). Kualitas Audit: Audit Tenure, Workload, Alignment dan Entrenchment Effect. Journal Ilmiah MEA, 3(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.31955/mea.vol3.iss2.pp1-15
Fitriani, M., & Asiah, A. N. (2018). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Likuiditas, dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 19(2), 31–40.
Grediani, E., & Niandari, N. (2017). Konsekuensi Penerimaan Opini Going Concern Dan. Jurnal Akuntansi, Ekonomi Dan Manajemen Bisnis Vol. 5 No. 1, 5(1), 45–54.
Husnimubaroq, R., & Majidah. (2019). Auditor Switching: Agresivitas Pajak, Corporate Governance, Spesialisasi Industri Auditor, Koneksi Politik Dan Karakteristik Perusahaan. Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset), 11(1), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.17509/jaset.v11i1.17421
IAPI. (2013). Standar Audit 700 Perumusan Suatu Opini dan Pelaporan Atas Laporan Keuangan. http://spap.iapi.or.id/1/files/SA 700/SA 700.pdf
IAPI. (2013). Standar Audit 705 Modifikasi Terhadap Opini Dalam Laporan Auditor Independen. http://spap.iapi.or.id/1/files/SA 700/SA 705.pdf
Jensen, C. M., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory Of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownwrship Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718812602
Kurnia, P., & Mella, N. F. (2018). Opini Audit Going Concern: Kajian Berdasarkan Kualitas Audit, Kondisi Keuangan, Audit Tenure, Ukuran Perusahaan, Pertumbuhan Perusahaan dan Opini Audit Tahun Sebelumnya pada Perusahaan yang Mengalami Financial Distress pada Perusahaan Manufaktur. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 6(1), 105–122. http://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/JRAK/article/view/8937/7437
Minerva, L., Sumeisey, V. S., Stefani, S., Wijaya, S., & Lim, C. A. (2020). Pengaruh Kualitas Audit, Debt Ratio, Ukuran Perusahaan dan Audit Lag terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern. Riset & Jurnal, 4(1), 254–266. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v4i1.180
Mutsanna, H., & Sukirno, S. (2020). Faktor Determinan Opini Audit Going Concern. Nominal: Barometer Riset Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 9(2), 112–131. https://doi.org/10.21831/nominal.v9i2.31600
Nelwan, A., & Tulung, J. E. (2018). Pengaruh Kebijakan Dividen, Keputusan Pendanaan dan Keputusan Investasi Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Pada Saham Bluechip yang Terdaftar Di Bei. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 6(4), 2878–2887. https://doi.org/10.35794/emba.v6i4.21196
Nurdin, N. N., Pratomo, D., & Triyanto, D. N. (2016). Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan dan Likuiditas Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Modifikasi Going Concern. E-Proceeding of Management, 3(3), 3266–3273.
Oktavia, D., & Nugraha, N. M. (2020). Pengaruh Keputusan Investasi, Keputusan Pendanaan, dan Kebijakan Dividen Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan. Jurnal Computech & Bisnis, 14(1), 1–9.
Oktaviani, & Challen, A. E. (2020). Pengaruh Kualitas Auditor, Audit Tenure dan Debt Default Terhadap Penerimaan Opini Audit Going Concern. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 8(2), 83–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29103/jak.v8i2.2727
Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2017). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 13/POJK.03/2017 tentang Penggunaan Jasa Akuntan Publik dan Kantor Akuntan Publik Dalam Kegiatan Jasa Keuangan. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, 1–63.
Suryani, S. (2020). Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Ukuran Perusahaan, Debt Default dan Audit Tenure terhadap Opini Audit Going Concern. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Kesatuan, 8(3), 245–252. https://doi.org/10.37641/jiakes.v8i3.346
Tandepadang, E. M., Majidah, & Yudowati, S. P. (2017). Analisis Determinan Opini Audit Going Concern. E-Proceeding of Management, 4(3), 2585–2591.
Zulkarnaen, W., Fitriani, I., & Yuningsih, N. (2020). Pengembangan Supply Chain Management Dalam Pengelolaan Distribusi Logistik Pemilu Yang Lebih Tepat Jenis, Tepat Jumlah Dan Tepat Waktu Berbasis Human Resources Competency Development Di KPU Jawa Barat. Jurnal Ilmiah MEA (Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi), 4(2), 222-243. https://doi.org/10.31955/mea.vol4.iss2.pp222-243.
Published
2021-11-23
How to Cite
Majidah, M., & Firdayanti, A. (2021). OPINI AUDIT GOING CONCERN : FAKTOR AUDITOR DAN FAKTOR NON AUDITOR. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi, & Akuntansi (MEA), 5(3), 2430-2445. https://doi.org/10.31955/mea.v5i3.1705