BUREAUCRACY REFORM THROUGH THE PERSPECTIVE OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN INDONESIA

Deding Ishak

doi:10.31955/mea.v5i1.1845

Deding Ishak STAI YAPATA Al-Jawami Bandung

DOI: https://doi.org/10.31955/mea.v5i1.1845

Keywords: Bureaucratic Reform, Public Administration, State

Abstract

Political developments in the new order era in Indonesia were filled with collusion, corruption and nepotism (KKN), so this required bureaucratic reform. To find a comprehensive understanding of the importance of implementing public reform from the perspective of public administration, it is then necessary to look at how the model of bureaucratic reform has previously been carried out, both in Indonesia and in other countries. A qualitative approach is used in this research method with research data sources and previous studies. The study results indicate that there are two dimensions related to bureaucratic reform that occurred in various countries, namely the organizational dimension and the human resource dimension of the apparatus.

References

Alma'arif, A. A., & Maksum, I. R. (2017). Functional Decentralization Construct in Decentralization Policy in Indone-sia (A study of Irrigation, Education, and Free Trade Sectors). JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik), 21(1), 59-81.
Ashaye, O. R., & Irani, Z. (2019). The role of stakeholders in the effective use of e-government resources in public services. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 253-270.
Bambang, P., Endang, L., & Hardi, W. (2019). Determination Factors of the Delegation Authority Policy in Administrative Services Integrated by Sub-District Known as (Paten) in Semarang City. European Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, (5), 56-70.
Batrancea, L., Nichita, A., Batrancea, I., & Gaban, L. (2018). The strenght of the relationship between shadow economy and corruption: Evidence from a worldwide country-sample. Social Indicators Research, 138(3), 1119-1143.
Benedikter, S. (2016). Bureaucratisation and the state revisited: Critical reflections on administrative reforms in post-renovation Vietnam. International Journal of Asia-Pacific Studies, 12(1).
Berenschot, W. (2018). Incumbent bureaucrats: Why elections undermine civil service reform in Indonesia. Public Administration and Development, 38(4), 135-143.
Bintang, S., Mujibussalim, M., & Fikri, F. (2019). Decentralization of Indonesia social health insurance. International Journal of Law and Management.
Busch, P. A., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2018). Digital discretion: A systematic literature review of ICT and street-level discretion. Information Polity, 23(1), 3-28.
Dasandi, N., & Esteve, M. (2017). The politics–bureaucracy interface in developing countries. Public Administration and Development, 37(4), 231-245.
Edwards, P., Sharma-Wallace, L., Wreford, A., Holt, L., Cradock-Henry, N. A., Flood, S., & Velarde, S. J. (2019). Tools for adaptive governance for complex social-ecological systems: a review of role-playing-games as serious games at the community-policy interface. Environmental Research Letters, 14(11), 113002.
Gaus, N., Sultan, S., & Basri, M. (2017). State bureaucracy in Indonesia and its reforms: An overview. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(8), 658-669.
Hall, D., Grimaldi, E., Gunter, H. M., Møller, J., Serpieri, R., & Skedsmo, G. (2015). Educational reform and modernisation in Europe: The role of national contexts in mediating the new public management. European Educational Research Journal, 14(6), 487-507.
Halley, A. A. (2015). Training top civil servants in turbulent environments: An ongoing struggle for curriculum. International Journal of Organization Theory & Behavior.
Janenova, S., & Knox, C. (2019). Civil service reform in Kazakhstan: trajectory to the 30 most developed countries?. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(3), 419-439.
Jerome, D. D. D., & Legge Jr, S. (2002). Politics and administration in US local governments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 12(3), 401-422.
Kettl, D. F. (2015). The transformation of governance: Public administration for the twenty-first century. Jhu Press.
Mandeli, K. N. (2016). New public governance in Saudi cities: An empirical assessment of the quality of the municipal system in Jeddah. Habitat International, 51, 114-123.
Meier, K. J., Compton, M., Polga-Hecimovich, J., Song, M., & Wimpy, C. (2019). Bureaucracy and the failure of politics: Challenges to democratic governance. Administration & Society, 51(10), 1576-1605.
Prasetyo, A. G., Nurjaman, R., & Sari, M. D. P. (2018). Overcoming Good Governance: Towards Localized and Contextual Public Administration in Indonesia. Atlantis, 191, 404-415.
Presthus, R. V. (2019). 7. Authority in organizations. In Authority and Social Work (pp. 77-89). University of Toronto Press.
Riyadi, B. S., Wibowo, B. R., & Susanti, V. (2020). Culture of Corruption Politicians’ Behavior in Parliament and State Official During Reform Government Indonesia (Genealogical Study). International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9, 52-62.
Rosenbloom, D. H. (2018). Administrative law for public managers. Routledge.
Schachter, H. L. (2017). Women in public administration: Giving gender a place in education for leadership. Administration & society, 49(1), 143-158.
Wahyurudhanto, A. (2020). Critical Reorientation of Bureaucratic Reform and Good Governance in Public Sector Administration in Indonesia. Webology, 17(2), 308-316.
Waldo, D. (2017). The social context.
Wibawa, S., Prasetyo, A. G., & Nur’aini, D. A. (2020). The Roots of Administrative Reform in Indonesia. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 13(11).